tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post4026638712386810388..comments2024-03-24T00:16:17.304-07:00Comments on Storming the Ivory Tower: Mapping Sex in the StarsSam Keeperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00863236889998956170noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-5521380260806149032020-03-15T22:59:03.433-07:002020-03-15T22:59:03.433-07:00Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all folks ...Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all folks you actually realize what you are speaking approximately! Bookmarked. Please also consult with my web site =). We may have a link alternate arrangement among us!Visit here to my web:: <a href="https://www.momobet-888.com" rel="nofollow">모모벳</a> | <a href="https://www.momobet-888.com" rel="nofollow">모모벳</a>Top Gambling Sitehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01600156075731595139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-23207762654831691342019-11-19T19:48:13.364-08:002019-11-19T19:48:13.364-08:00I think this is an enlightening post and it is par...I think this is an enlightening post and it is particularly valuable and proficient. I just want to let you know that I just check out your site and I find it very entertaining and informative. I am so grateful that I have read your amazing article. <a href="https://www.totom1.com/%ED%86%A0%ED%86%A0%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%ED%8A%B8%EC%B6%94%EC%B2%9C/" rel="nofollow">Read more...</a>Top Gambling Sitehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01600156075731595139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-19669672541411109722012-07-02T10:21:19.060-07:002012-07-02T10:21:19.060-07:00I like your version better, for the record.
I mig...I like your version better, for the record.<br /><br />I might revisit this at some point... there are a lot of problems, though, as you found out :PSam Keeperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00863236889998956170noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-43779863626946167022012-06-24T23:32:44.899-07:002012-06-24T23:32:44.899-07:00I was looking at the very last chart, and it was p...I was looking at the very last chart, and it was pretty good, but I fixed it up a little for you. http://i.imgur.com/noQPe.png<br /><br />In all seriousness though, kind of wanted to say I agreed with the others above in that it's harder to read, and sometimes, I have difficulty understanding what a few of the symbols themselves actually mean, even with the description.<br /><br />There's also that sometimes, I'm not sure where I would place myself, even after thinking about the actual category myself. Best example is Gender Expression. Should I go with what I am actually consciously doing, or by what the people around me consider me doing? Because I always feel like I'm "doing" female more than what other people consider me to be "doing." Not only that, but thinking about my combination of possible "doing" of gender, how do I place it on here, especially with the addition of the asexual axis? What should I consider "asexual doing" of gender? Would my Gender Expression be about the same as my significant other/somepony's Gender Expression, even though we're doing it differently?<br /><br />Other than that, I'm excited about this being created. It looks hard, but if you do decide to go back and fix some things, I'm excited to what will come out of this!LadyOctopusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-28742042566729346792012-04-07T16:15:31.869-07:002012-04-07T16:15:31.869-07:00Great post! http://youtu.be/s_k3fdIMh_4Great post! http://youtu.be/s_k3fdIMh_4CPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08136038077848904960noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-44413735083958925082012-03-13T14:01:07.929-07:002012-03-13T14:01:07.929-07:00First of all, blogspot needs an "edit" f...First of all, blogspot needs an "edit" feature.<br /><br />Second of all, I just thought of something; is the "degree" supposed to be the axis with the asexual triangle? Would someone described by my "lots of interest in women and some in men" be skewed towards women and be at the bottom of the chart while my "a little interest in women and none in men" person be higher up on your chart?<br /><br />Maybe I've answered my own question. It definitely requires some thought to wrap your head around...Dav Flamerockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07536434562663923502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-54998148322297577392012-03-13T13:58:17.058-07:002012-03-13T13:58:17.058-07:00First off, SO FRAKKING AWESOME! I love it. Hopeful...First off, SO FRAKKING AWESOME! I love it. Hopefully my twitter followers find it interesting too.<br /><br />My first request would be for you to post a blank version of it, if only so I can tinker with it/make my own.<br /><br />Second, and this is partially to follow up on Yxoque's criticism, is that it's hard to know how to put down something that might encompass a wide range of things. For example, you are pansexual--at least to some extent you can be attracted to men as well as women. How would you express that? My guess is that you would put it more towards the "Asexual" triangle, since your attraction is not defined by sexual (or gendered) traits...<br />...however it's very unclear.<br /><br />Also take, say, "Willingness to Play;" if the base "Willingness to Play" is, on average, pretty high but higher for women than for men, how would you differentiate that from someone who's willing to play with only women only a little bit? Both of them would be skewed slightly towards the female end, but it doesn't differentiate between "Lots of interest in women and some in men" and "a little interest in women and none in men" because the ratios here are the same. See what I mean?<br /><br />What if a scale (with axes) isn't what we need? It could be that we need a graphic that an describe attractions to/descriptions of different genders independently. A scale might work great for gender identity, but not for romantic/sexual attraction. But I digress...<br /><br />Anyway, I love that you did this and I would love to see where it evolves if/when you continue to tinker with it!Dav Flamerockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07536434562663923502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-10911858560170181392012-03-13T13:54:16.090-07:002012-03-13T13:54:16.090-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Dav Flamerockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07536434562663923502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-83287961277242320102012-03-11T14:09:51.946-07:002012-03-11T14:09:51.946-07:00This was very interesting to read, for a variety o...This was very interesting to read, for a variety of reasons: learning about problem-solving, (graphical) design and sexuality. So +1 for the content.<br /><br />I'm less sold on the sexuality triangle. I'll try to be as constructive as possible with my criticism, but it might be hard, since I don't know much about the stuff.<br /><br />First of all, the graphic isn't easily grokable. The Kinsey-scale might not allow for much variance, but everyone can look at it, and understand it instantly. This also goes for your pony wheel. The reason, I think, it's not grokable is because it tries to present too much information. This is only a problem, because (as you said) you are still missing a lot of information on it. I honestly don't know how to fix this.<br />Following from this: it's not easy to read. You can't look at it, and in less than a minute, know what kind of person it represents. Partly, this comes from the fact that the symbols aren't clear in what they represent. You constantly have to check, and recheck which symbol means what. This might be remedied by just using abbreviations, instead of colors and symbols but that might defeat the purpose (and the Poly/Mono distinction becomes less clear).<br /><br />I really like the effort, and it certainly made me thing about sexuality, but as a graph, it doesn't quite work for me. Part of it is certainly the fact that sexuality is extremely difficult to define and represent.Yxoquehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01728852618699602516noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-57115088796501255912012-03-11T12:59:00.537-07:002012-03-11T12:59:00.537-07:00Comment 1: Yay! I helped a bloggy thingy! The seco...Comment 1: Yay! I helped a bloggy thingy! The second I typed that comment, I was kind of hoping that you would do pretty much exactly this with it. Glad I could help xD<br /><br />Comment 2: " It's sexuality as expressed not by psychiatric medicine (no offense, Timebaum) but by artistic sentiment." The only time I think psychology/psychiatry and sexuality should mix are A) To get Santorum to admit that, when someone thinks about gay sex as much as he does, he's probably gay and B) To get sexually repressed people to admit that there's nothing wrong with other sexualities and open themselves to other options.<br /><br />Comment 3: Please, please, please make some kind of interactive version of this. I would very much like to make one of my own.<br /><br />Comment 4: So, with the mechanics of the whole thing, if you were to put, say, "Willingness to Play" towards the male side, that would refer to Willingness to Play with Males, correct? It's not saying that in a "You prefer the generic Male way of playing, which is with females," right?Mixter Casualhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06585844188470546859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56230747868041478.post-71988605684212523522012-03-11T08:46:36.129-07:002012-03-11T08:46:36.129-07:00This! You've gotten back to the crux of the bl...This! You've gotten back to the crux of the blog, which is "Here's a problem, and here's how I used - and by extension, how you can use - the liberal arts to solve it!"<br /><br />I would very much be interested in making that Flashmajig! =DPhoenixFyrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04971014937994766726noreply@blogger.com